<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 585 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361758</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal and allowed the appeal, ruling that multiple demands for the same service, from the same assessee, for the same period are impermissible under the law. The Tribunal found the impugned show cause notice unsustainable and ruled in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 06:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 585 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361758</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal and allowed the appeal, ruling that multiple demands for the same service, from the same assessee, for the same period are impermissible under the law. The Tribunal found the impugned show cause notice unsustainable and ruled in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>