<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 121 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13333</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed the tax case appeals, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the inclusion of excise duty and sales tax in total turnover for section 80HHC deduction and the deletion of additions on account of unaccounted sale of scrap and inflated expenses based on disclosures before the Settlement Commission. The court upheld that excise duty and sales tax should not be included in total turnover for section 80HHC benefits, emphasizing the self-contained nature of the provision. Additionally, the court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the additions as they were disclosed by individual directors before the Settlement Commission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:05:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 121 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13333</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed the tax case appeals, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the inclusion of excise duty and sales tax in total turnover for section 80HHC deduction and the deletion of additions on account of unaccounted sale of scrap and inflated expenses based on disclosures before the Settlement Commission. The court upheld that excise duty and sales tax should not be included in total turnover for section 80HHC benefits, emphasizing the self-contained nature of the provision. Additionally, the court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the additions as they were disclosed by individual directors before the Settlement Commission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>