<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1572 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273266</link>
    <description>The appeal in this case was partly allowed for the rectification of a mistake in the allowance of tax credit. The final order corrected the error by clarifying that the credit was correctly availed only for services used for providing output services other than &#039;works contract.&#039; The rectification aimed to ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations, specifically addressing the issue of ineligible output services related to construction and works contract services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 20:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1572 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273266</link>
      <description>The appeal in this case was partly allowed for the rectification of a mistake in the allowance of tax credit. The final order corrected the error by clarifying that the credit was correctly availed only for services used for providing output services other than &#039;works contract.&#039; The rectification aimed to ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations, specifically addressing the issue of ineligible output services related to construction and works contract services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>