<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1387 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273267</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the appeal as the appellant failed to prove that different goods imported had similar characteristics as the principal goods. The burden of proof was on the assessee to establish this similarity, which was not done.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 20:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1387 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273267</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the appeal as the appellant failed to prove that different goods imported had similar characteristics as the principal goods. The burden of proof was on the assessee to establish this similarity, which was not done.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>