https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273268 The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal held that the denial of credit of service tax for services provided to job workers was unfounded. The Tribunal emphasized that input services need not be used within the manufacturer's premises but must contribute to the manufacture of the final product. Relying on precedents and legal provisions, including Rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was entitled to credit for services used at the job worker's premises. The judgment was rendered on 28/09/2017. en-us Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jun 2018 20:56:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273268 The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal held that the denial of credit of service tax for services provided to job workers was unfounded. The Tribunal emphasized that input services need not be used within the manufacturer's premises but must contribute to the manufacture of the final product. Relying on precedents and legal provisions, including Rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was entitled to credit for services used at the job worker's premises. The judgment was rendered on 28/09/2017. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273268