<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 116 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13330</link>
    <description>A writ petition by a regional rural bank was held not maintainable without prior clearance from the High Powered Committee. Applying the settled principle governing disputes between Government departments and other public bodies under governmental control, the Court treated the bank as an instrumentality controlled by the Central Government and held that the clearance mechanism applied. It further held that the Committee could consider an interim arrangement while deciding permission to litigate, so the absence of interim powers did not defeat the procedure. The petition was dismissed for want of prior clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:58:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 116 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13330</link>
      <description>A writ petition by a regional rural bank was held not maintainable without prior clearance from the High Powered Committee. Applying the settled principle governing disputes between Government departments and other public bodies under governmental control, the Court treated the bank as an instrumentality controlled by the Central Government and held that the clearance mechanism applied. It further held that the Committee could consider an interim arrangement while deciding permission to litigate, so the absence of interim powers did not defeat the procedure. The petition was dismissed for want of prior clearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>