<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1346 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273248</link>
    <description>The court admitted the company petitions but deferred publication, requiring the respondent to pay outstanding dues in installments. The respondent was estopped from denying admitted liabilities, and its counterclaims were deemed invalid. The decision aimed to protect public services while ensuring fair treatment of both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:54:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1346 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273248</link>
      <description>The court admitted the company petitions but deferred publication, requiring the respondent to pay outstanding dues in installments. The respondent was estopped from denying admitted liabilities, and its counterclaims were deemed invalid. The decision aimed to protect public services while ensuring fair treatment of both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>