https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273246 Civil court jurisdiction under the Minimum Wages Act was held not to be excluded because Section 24 barred only specified suits for wage recovery and the statutory scheme did not expressly or necessarily bar an employer's challenge to the applicability of a wage notification. Sub-normal tea garden workers known as Letter a challans were also held not to fall within "ordinary unskilled labour" for whom full minimum wages were fixed, since they could not work a normal day because of incapacity, age, infirmity or similar conditions. The notification and proviso to Section 15 were applied to deny full minimum wages in those circumstances. en-us Fri, 18 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:37:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273246 Civil court jurisdiction under the Minimum Wages Act was held not to be excluded because Section 24 barred only specified suits for wage recovery and the statutory scheme did not expressly or necessarily bar an employer's challenge to the applicability of a wage notification. Sub-normal tea garden workers known as Letter a challans were also held not to fall within "ordinary unskilled labour" for whom full minimum wages were fixed, since they could not work a normal day because of incapacity, age, infirmity or similar conditions. The notification and proviso to Section 15 were applied to deny full minimum wages in those circumstances. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273246