<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1564 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273243</link>
    <description>Departmental appeals below the prescribed monetary threshold were barred by the Government&#039;s litigation policy, unless they fell within specified exclusions such as classification or refund matters of a legal and recurring nature. As the dispute did not fall within any exception, the Tribunal did not examine the merits and treated the appeal as not maintainable. The appeal was therefore dismissed under the litigation policy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:06:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1564 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273243</link>
      <description>Departmental appeals below the prescribed monetary threshold were barred by the Government&#039;s litigation policy, unless they fell within specified exclusions such as classification or refund matters of a legal and recurring nature. As the dispute did not fall within any exception, the Tribunal did not examine the merits and treated the appeal as not maintainable. The appeal was therefore dismissed under the litigation policy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>