<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 555 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361728</link>
    <description>A chit fund company was held not entitled to mutuality for foreman dividend because the foreman&#039;s rights and obligations differ from those of subscribers and the activity is commercial and profit-oriented; the dividend was therefore taxable. Bad debts relating to running and terminated chits were allowed, as earlier year decisions accepted write-off of irrecoverable amounts from prized subscribers as bad debt or business loss. Commission on cancelled chits was treated as accruing only on final settlement of the defaulting subscriber&#039;s account. Royalty paid to the holding company was allowed as business expenditure on grounds of commercial expediency and legitimate business benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 555 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361728</link>
      <description>A chit fund company was held not entitled to mutuality for foreman dividend because the foreman&#039;s rights and obligations differ from those of subscribers and the activity is commercial and profit-oriented; the dividend was therefore taxable. Bad debts relating to running and terminated chits were allowed, as earlier year decisions accepted write-off of irrecoverable amounts from prized subscribers as bad debt or business loss. Commission on cancelled chits was treated as accruing only on final settlement of the defaulting subscriber&#039;s account. Royalty paid to the holding company was allowed as business expenditure on grounds of commercial expediency and legitimate business benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>