<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 546 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361719</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessees&#039; cross-objections. The addition of Rs. 5 Crores for the construction of &quot;Hotel Apple Tree&quot; was deemed unjustified due to lack of concrete evidence beyond a disputed statement recorded during a survey. The judgment emphasized the necessity of valid evidence in tax assessments and adherence to procedural requirements during surveys for fair treatment of taxpayers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 546 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361719</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessees&#039; cross-objections. The addition of Rs. 5 Crores for the construction of &quot;Hotel Apple Tree&quot; was deemed unjustified due to lack of concrete evidence beyond a disputed statement recorded during a survey. The judgment emphasized the necessity of valid evidence in tax assessments and adherence to procedural requirements during surveys for fair treatment of taxpayers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>