<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 540 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361713</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 272A(2)(c) of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the appeal. It found that the Income Tax Officer (Intelligence) had jurisdiction to issue the notice under Section 133(6), the penalty order was within the time limit prescribed by Section 275(1)(c), and there was no reasonable cause shown for non-compliance. The decision aligned with previous Tribunal rulings in comparable cases, ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 540 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361713</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 272A(2)(c) of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the appeal. It found that the Income Tax Officer (Intelligence) had jurisdiction to issue the notice under Section 133(6), the penalty order was within the time limit prescribed by Section 275(1)(c), and there was no reasonable cause shown for non-compliance. The decision aligned with previous Tribunal rulings in comparable cases, ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>