<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 532 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361705</link>
    <description>Delay in filing appeals was excused because the appellants had repeatedly sought relied upon documents from the department, but those documents were not supplied. The Tribunal accepted that the appellants waited for the missing documents before filing the appeals and treated the non-supply as the cause of delay. On that basis, the condonation applications were allowed and the delayed appeals were admitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 08:54:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 532 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361705</link>
      <description>Delay in filing appeals was excused because the appellants had repeatedly sought relied upon documents from the department, but those documents were not supplied. The Tribunal accepted that the appellants waited for the missing documents before filing the appeals and treated the non-supply as the cause of delay. On that basis, the condonation applications were allowed and the delayed appeals were admitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>