<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 524 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361697</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal regarding the liability to pay service tax on incentives received for forwarding cargo through airlines under Business Auxiliary Services. The Tribunal held that activities like buying and selling cargo space for profit without acting on behalf of a client do not constitute taxable services under Business Auxiliary Service. Citing precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that for a demand under Business Auxiliary Service to be sustained, there must be involvement of a third party in the transaction, which was lacking in this case. The appeal was dismissed based on established legal principles and precedents favoring the assessee-respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 524 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361697</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal regarding the liability to pay service tax on incentives received for forwarding cargo through airlines under Business Auxiliary Services. The Tribunal held that activities like buying and selling cargo space for profit without acting on behalf of a client do not constitute taxable services under Business Auxiliary Service. Citing precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that for a demand under Business Auxiliary Service to be sustained, there must be involvement of a third party in the transaction, which was lacking in this case. The appeal was dismissed based on established legal principles and precedents favoring the assessee-respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>