<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (1) TMI 90 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273231</link>
    <description>Under the Employees&#039; Provident Funds Act and Scheme, employer contribution and administrative charges were treated as recoverable from the date the Scheme became applicable to the establishment, because the obligation arose immediately and did not depend on departmental discovery or demand. Administrative charges, being linked to the contribution and fund administration, were also recoverable for the same period. By contrast, damages for default required proof of actual default through a proper adjudicatory process and could not be inferred merely from non-payment during the pre-discovery period; that issue was remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:01:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (1) TMI 90 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273231</link>
      <description>Under the Employees&#039; Provident Funds Act and Scheme, employer contribution and administrative charges were treated as recoverable from the date the Scheme became applicable to the establishment, because the obligation arose immediately and did not depend on departmental discovery or demand. Administrative charges, being linked to the contribution and fund administration, were also recoverable for the same period. By contrast, damages for default required proof of actual default through a proper adjudicatory process and could not be inferred merely from non-payment during the pre-discovery period; that issue was remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>