<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1928 (2) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273222</link>
    <description>A life insurance policy naming a spouse as nominee does not, by itself, create a trust or confer an immediate beneficial interest in the policy proceeds. The nominee can enforce payment only if the contract, read as a whole, or surrounding circumstances clearly disclose a trust or equitable obligation in her favour. In the absence of such trust language, the proceeds remain part of the deceased assured&#039;s estate and may be available to estate creditors. The discussion also notes that the Married Women&#039;s Property Act applies only where the policy brings the case within its statutory trust protection; mere nomination is insufficient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 1928 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:52:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1928 (2) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273222</link>
      <description>A life insurance policy naming a spouse as nominee does not, by itself, create a trust or confer an immediate beneficial interest in the policy proceeds. The nominee can enforce payment only if the contract, read as a whole, or surrounding circumstances clearly disclose a trust or equitable obligation in her favour. In the absence of such trust language, the proceeds remain part of the deceased assured&#039;s estate and may be available to estate creditors. The discussion also notes that the Married Women&#039;s Property Act applies only where the policy brings the case within its statutory trust protection; mere nomination is insufficient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 1928 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>