<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 177 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13317</link>
    <description>The High Court interpreted section 80J of the Income-tax Act in a case involving a dispute over deduction for industrial undertakings. The court held that the assessee was eligible for the deduction as the benefit is based on capital employed, not machinery. The court emphasized the deeming provision exempting machinery value below 20% of total plant value. Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument on old machinery use, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction for the relevant assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:14:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 177 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13317</link>
      <description>The High Court interpreted section 80J of the Income-tax Act in a case involving a dispute over deduction for industrial undertakings. The court held that the assessee was eligible for the deduction as the benefit is based on capital employed, not machinery. The court emphasized the deeming provision exempting machinery value below 20% of total plant value. Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument on old machinery use, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction for the relevant assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>