<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1930 (5) TMI 13 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273220</link>
    <description>Where correspondence used to support firm registration is incomplete because one party has not expressly accepted all proposed terms, the defect may be cured by a supplementary letter either waiving the remaining conditions or recording express acceptance. The court treated the amended application as the same application made within time, so the registration request was not rejected on that preliminary ambiguity. The question referred was therefore not taken up at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:26:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1930 (5) TMI 13 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273220</link>
      <description>Where correspondence used to support firm registration is incomplete because one party has not expressly accepted all proposed terms, the defect may be cured by a supplementary letter either waiving the remaining conditions or recording express acceptance. The court treated the amended application as the same application made within time, so the registration request was not rejected on that preliminary ambiguity. The question referred was therefore not taken up at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>