https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273215 A suit seeking removal of trustees appointed under a court-settled scheme and substitution of a fresh management was not maintainable where, in substance, it aimed to displace or override that scheme. A scheme framed under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure binds all concerned, and any variation, supersession, or replacement of trustees appointed under it must be sought before the court that sanctioned the scheme through the same statutory mechanism. A separate suit in another court, advancing rights hostile to the scheme, cannot be used to circumvent it. en-us Fri, 04 May 1945 00:00:00 +0630 Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:27:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273215 A suit seeking removal of trustees appointed under a court-settled scheme and substitution of a fresh management was not maintainable where, in substance, it aimed to displace or override that scheme. A scheme framed under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure binds all concerned, and any variation, supersession, or replacement of trustees appointed under it must be sought before the court that sanctioned the scheme through the same statutory mechanism. A separate suit in another court, advancing rights hostile to the scheme, cannot be used to circumvent it. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 May 1945 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273215