https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273214 A scheme decree framed under Section 92 CPC was treated as binding on all persons, including those not party to the scheme suit, and as barring any private claim inconsistent with it. A person claiming hereditary rights to control and superintendence of a mosque could not maintain a fresh suit to assert those rights without first setting aside or displacing the scheme. The alleged hereditary claim therefore could not be examined on merits, and the dismissal of the suit was sustained. en-us Fri, 21 Mar 1947 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:19:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273214 A scheme decree framed under Section 92 CPC was treated as binding on all persons, including those not party to the scheme suit, and as barring any private claim inconsistent with it. A person claiming hereditary rights to control and superintendence of a mosque could not maintain a fresh suit to assert those rights without first setting aside or displacing the scheme. The alleged hereditary claim therefore could not be examined on merits, and the dismissal of the suit was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Mar 1947 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273214