<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 509 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361682</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of freight and insurance charges from total turnover for deduction under section 10B, treated product development expenditure as revenue, disallowed a donation not wholly for business purposes, classified assets for depreciation, found the disallowance under section 14A unsustainable due to insufficient examination, remanded the issue of foreign travel expenses, upheld disallowance of provision for leave encashment, allowed deduction of demat charges, treated water pipeline expenditure as revenue, permitted rent for a bungalow as a business expense, allowed reduction of Wealth Tax for computing book profit, and did not explicitly address certain purchases as bogus. The decisions generally favored the assessee, emphasizing proper classification and adherence to legal standards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 22:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 509 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361682</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of freight and insurance charges from total turnover for deduction under section 10B, treated product development expenditure as revenue, disallowed a donation not wholly for business purposes, classified assets for depreciation, found the disallowance under section 14A unsustainable due to insufficient examination, remanded the issue of foreign travel expenses, upheld disallowance of provision for leave encashment, allowed deduction of demat charges, treated water pipeline expenditure as revenue, permitted rent for a bungalow as a business expense, allowed reduction of Wealth Tax for computing book profit, and did not explicitly address certain purchases as bogus. The decisions generally favored the assessee, emphasizing proper classification and adherence to legal standards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>