<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 499 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361672</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, concluding that the assessee had reasonable cause for the delay in filing e-TDS returns due to technical challenges. The penalty under section 272A(2)(k) was deleted, emphasizing the applicability of section 273B for cases of reasonable cause. The Assessing Officer was directed to adjust penalties, restricting them to the first quarter only and eliminating penalties for overlapping defaults. The order was pronounced on June 5, 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 22:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 499 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361672</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, concluding that the assessee had reasonable cause for the delay in filing e-TDS returns due to technical challenges. The penalty under section 272A(2)(k) was deleted, emphasizing the applicability of section 273B for cases of reasonable cause. The Assessing Officer was directed to adjust penalties, restricting them to the first quarter only and eliminating penalties for overlapping defaults. The order was pronounced on June 5, 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>