<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 494 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361667</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed some additions, remitted others for fresh consideration, and upheld deletions in a tax case involving undisclosed income from various sources. The decisions were based on evidence presented by the assessee, with the Tribunal emphasizing the importance of corroborative evidence and adherence to principles of natural justice in determining undisclosed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 494 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361667</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed some additions, remitted others for fresh consideration, and upheld deletions in a tax case involving undisclosed income from various sources. The decisions were based on evidence presented by the assessee, with the Tribunal emphasizing the importance of corroborative evidence and adherence to principles of natural justice in determining undisclosed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>