<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 489 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on an employee of Anmol Shipping Agency for forgery and fabrication of documents, dismissing his appeal. It remanded the issue of duty liability of transferee importers back to the adjudicating authority for a detailed reconsideration, emphasizing that duty can be demanded from transferees of forged licenses. The Tribunal highlighted the principle of &quot;Caveat Emptor&quot; and directed a fresh examination of the case with proper reasoning and consideration of relevant case laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 489 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on an employee of Anmol Shipping Agency for forgery and fabrication of documents, dismissing his appeal. It remanded the issue of duty liability of transferee importers back to the adjudicating authority for a detailed reconsideration, emphasizing that duty can be demanded from transferees of forged licenses. The Tribunal highlighted the principle of &quot;Caveat Emptor&quot; and directed a fresh examination of the case with proper reasoning and consideration of relevant case laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>