<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 480 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361653</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant on the issues of Technical Inspection and Certification Services and Membership of Club &amp;amp; Association Services, exempting them from service tax. However, the appeal was dismissed concerning Business Exhibition Services and Business Auxiliary Services. Penalties under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994, were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 08:45:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 480 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361653</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant on the issues of Technical Inspection and Certification Services and Membership of Club &amp;amp; Association Services, exempting them from service tax. However, the appeal was dismissed concerning Business Exhibition Services and Business Auxiliary Services. Penalties under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994, were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>