<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 474 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361647</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by M/s Alps Container Pvt. Ltd. and an individual, overturning the confirmation of demand and penalties imposed for Central Excise duty. The original adjudicating authority&#039;s method for determining the assessable value was deemed arbitrary and based on unfounded presumptions, lacking sufficient reasoning and data. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a logical and justified approach in assessing Central Excise duty, cautioning against arbitrary assessments rooted in assumptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 474 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361647</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by M/s Alps Container Pvt. Ltd. and an individual, overturning the confirmation of demand and penalties imposed for Central Excise duty. The original adjudicating authority&#039;s method for determining the assessable value was deemed arbitrary and based on unfounded presumptions, lacking sufficient reasoning and data. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a logical and justified approach in assessing Central Excise duty, cautioning against arbitrary assessments rooted in assumptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>