<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 175 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13308</link>
    <description>The court clarified that for exemption under section 10(26) of the Income-tax Act, individuals must be members of Scheduled Tribes residing in specified areas with income from those regions. Permanent residence and tribal recognition are crucial for eligibility. The court directed the Revenue to reassess petitioners&#039; cases based on these criteria and issue exemption certificates accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 175 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13308</link>
      <description>The court clarified that for exemption under section 10(26) of the Income-tax Act, individuals must be members of Scheduled Tribes residing in specified areas with income from those regions. Permanent residence and tribal recognition are crucial for eligibility. The court directed the Revenue to reassess petitioners&#039; cases based on these criteria and issue exemption certificates accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>