https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273204 The High Court's jurisdiction under Article 226 was held to form part of the basic structure through judicial review, so Article 323-A(2)(d) is unconstitutional to the extent it authorises exclusion of that jurisdiction in service matters. The abolition of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal under Article 371-D was construed as ending the earlier tribunal arrangement, but it did not automatically revive High Court writ jurisdiction. Section 28 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 was also invalid to the extent it excluded Article 226 jurisdiction. The service disputes were left to be pursued before the statutory forum in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 26 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:57:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273204 The High Court's jurisdiction under Article 226 was held to form part of the basic structure through judicial review, so Article 323-A(2)(d) is unconstitutional to the extent it authorises exclusion of that jurisdiction in service matters. The abolition of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal under Article 371-D was construed as ending the earlier tribunal arrangement, but it did not automatically revive High Court writ jurisdiction. Section 28 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 was also invalid to the extent it excluded Article 226 jurisdiction. The service disputes were left to be pursued before the statutory forum in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273204