<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (10) TMI 39 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273203</link>
    <description>Industrial disputes legislation was treated as a complete code, so certiorari under Article 226 was not ordinarily available to quash an interim award that remained within jurisdiction. The tribunal&#039;s power to grant interim relief pending final determination was upheld, including a direction fixing the operative date of the award. The statutory distinction between an award becoming operative and becoming enforceable meant that a one-week payment direction did not, by itself, offend the scheme of the Act. The reference to the earlier resolution was regarded as background rather than a jurisdictional error, and the employer&#039;s writ challenge to the interim award failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:28:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (10) TMI 39 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273203</link>
      <description>Industrial disputes legislation was treated as a complete code, so certiorari under Article 226 was not ordinarily available to quash an interim award that remained within jurisdiction. The tribunal&#039;s power to grant interim relief pending final determination was upheld, including a direction fixing the operative date of the award. The statutory distinction between an award becoming operative and becoming enforceable meant that a one-week payment direction did not, by itself, offend the scheme of the Act. The reference to the earlier resolution was regarded as background rather than a jurisdictional error, and the employer&#039;s writ challenge to the interim award failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>