<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1931 (12) TMI 13 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273189</link>
    <description>The court held that the amount remitted between branches was from profits, not capital, and therefore subject to Income Tax. Justices Ramesam and Cornish concurred with this decision, awarding costs to the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 1931 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 10:29:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1931 (12) TMI 13 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273189</link>
      <description>The court held that the amount remitted between branches was from profits, not capital, and therefore subject to Income Tax. Justices Ramesam and Cornish concurred with this decision, awarding costs to the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 1931 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>