<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 470 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361643</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the capital gains by adopting the Fair Market Value of the property on the date of dissolution as the cost of acquisition. Other grounds of appeal were dismissed either as not pressed or for lack of merit. The order was pronounced in the open court on 30.05.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 09:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 470 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361643</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the capital gains by adopting the Fair Market Value of the property on the date of dissolution as the cost of acquisition. Other grounds of appeal were dismissed either as not pressed or for lack of merit. The order was pronounced in the open court on 30.05.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>