<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 469 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361642</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the settlement charges paid to SEBI were not penalties for legal infractions but were incurred to settle disputes and maintain business operations. The charges were deemed allowable business expenses under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the deductibility of the settlement charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 469 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361642</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the settlement charges paid to SEBI were not penalties for legal infractions but were incurred to settle disputes and maintain business operations. The charges were deemed allowable business expenses under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the deductibility of the settlement charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>