<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 441 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361614</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order, remanding the matter for reevaluation by excluding reimbursable expenses from the taxable value and setting aside all penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act. The appeal was partly allowed, granting relief to the appellant concerning liability and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 07:32:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 441 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361614</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order, remanding the matter for reevaluation by excluding reimbursable expenses from the taxable value and setting aside all penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act. The appeal was partly allowed, granting relief to the appellant concerning liability and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>