https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361611 The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties against the appellant, who was engaged in laying pipes for BSNL. The Tribunal held that the department should have considered the abatement before determining the taxable value for assessing eligibility against the threshold limit. By not allowing the abatement as per Notification No.1/2006-ST, the department's demand was found unsustainable, leading to the appeal being allowed with any consequential relief as per the law. en-us Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jun 2018 07:32:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361611 The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties against the appellant, who was engaged in laying pipes for BSNL. The Tribunal held that the department should have considered the abatement before determining the taxable value for assessing eligibility against the threshold limit. By not allowing the abatement as per Notification No.1/2006-ST, the department's demand was found unsustainable, leading to the appeal being allowed with any consequential relief as per the law. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361611