<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 434 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361607</link>
    <description>Redrawing duty-paid wire rods and tubes was treated as manufacture only if the finished product was proved to be wire in coil form; on the record, that proof was absent, so manufacture was not established. Non-filing of a declaration under the small scale exemption notification was regarded as a procedural lapse rather than a substantive bar, so the exemption could not be denied on that ground alone. A clandestine clearance allegation based only on transport documents and third-party records, without corroboration from the assessee&#039;s records or premises, was found unreliable and insufficient to sustain duty demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 434 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361607</link>
      <description>Redrawing duty-paid wire rods and tubes was treated as manufacture only if the finished product was proved to be wire in coil form; on the record, that proof was absent, so manufacture was not established. Non-filing of a declaration under the small scale exemption notification was regarded as a procedural lapse rather than a substantive bar, so the exemption could not be denied on that ground alone. A clandestine clearance allegation based only on transport documents and third-party records, without corroboration from the assessee&#039;s records or premises, was found unreliable and insufficient to sustain duty demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>