<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1721 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273182</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to re-visit the computation of Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) under the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method for the sale of shares, consistent with the subsequent assessment year 2008-09. The levy of interest under Section 234B was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 13:21:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1721 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273182</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to re-visit the computation of Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) under the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method for the sale of shares, consistent with the subsequent assessment year 2008-09. The levy of interest under Section 234B was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>