<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (10) TMI 218 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273179</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the dismissal order, and remitted the case back to the High Court for expeditious disposal after finding the penalty imposed for failure to comply with the order to supply paper-books disproportionate. The appellants had since provided the paper-books. The High Court was granted discretion in handling the appeal without costs imposed on either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 12:40:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (10) TMI 218 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273179</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the dismissal order, and remitted the case back to the High Court for expeditious disposal after finding the penalty imposed for failure to comply with the order to supply paper-books disproportionate. The appellants had since provided the paper-books. The High Court was granted discretion in handling the appeal without costs imposed on either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>