https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361598 Part-B of the e-way bill records vehicle details and destination, and seizure cannot be justified where the required particulars have already been furnished. The record showed that the petitioner supplied the relevant details on 25.05.2018, so detention of the goods and vehicle on 26.05.2018 for absence of Part-B particulars was unjustified. Pending further proceedings, interim release was directed on suitable security, with release to be made against security other than cash or bank guarantee equivalent to the proposed tax. en-us Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Feb 2025 12:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361598 Part-B of the e-way bill records vehicle details and destination, and seizure cannot be justified where the required particulars have already been furnished. The record showed that the petitioner supplied the relevant details on 25.05.2018, so detention of the goods and vehicle on 26.05.2018 for absence of Part-B particulars was unjustified. Pending further proceedings, interim release was directed on suitable security, with release to be made against security other than cash or bank guarantee equivalent to the proposed tax. Case-Laws GST Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361598