<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 418 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361591</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the assessee bank was not required to deduct TDS from interest payments to NOIDA and Greater NOIDA Authority as they are exempt under Section 194A(3)(iii)(f) per CBDT Notification No. 3489. The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, consistent with the Allahabad High Court precedent in CIT Vs. Canara Bank. The order was pronounced on 7th June 2018, in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 418 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361591</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the assessee bank was not required to deduct TDS from interest payments to NOIDA and Greater NOIDA Authority as they are exempt under Section 194A(3)(iii)(f) per CBDT Notification No. 3489. The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, consistent with the Allahabad High Court precedent in CIT Vs. Canara Bank. The order was pronounced on 7th June 2018, in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>