<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 411 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361584</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO under Sections 68 and 69C of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of proper application of statutory provisions and verification of expenses recorded in the books of account. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in its entirety, with the Tribunal criticizing the AO and senior officers for their incorrect application of the law and lack of understanding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 411 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361584</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO under Sections 68 and 69C of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of proper application of statutory provisions and verification of expenses recorded in the books of account. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in its entirety, with the Tribunal criticizing the AO and senior officers for their incorrect application of the law and lack of understanding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>