<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 397 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361570</link>
    <description>The court condoned the delay in refiling the appeal and allowed the application. The dispute revolved around the applicability of Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on turnover discounts. The court upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee. It concluded that the trade discounts were distinct from commissions, and the Assessing Officer failed to prove otherwise. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 397 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361570</link>
      <description>The court condoned the delay in refiling the appeal and allowed the application. The dispute revolved around the applicability of Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on turnover discounts. The court upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee. It concluded that the trade discounts were distinct from commissions, and the Assessing Officer failed to prove otherwise. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>