<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 118 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13290</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat replacement expenditure on machinery as revenue expenditure for the assessment year 2000-01. The court found that the concept of block of assets was not applicable in this case, as the replacement did not lead to acquiring new assets with enduring advantages. The decision aligned with past judgments, and no substantial legal question necessitated further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:35:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 118 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13290</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat replacement expenditure on machinery as revenue expenditure for the assessment year 2000-01. The court found that the concept of block of assets was not applicable in this case, as the replacement did not lead to acquiring new assets with enduring advantages. The decision aligned with past judgments, and no substantial legal question necessitated further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>