<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 383 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361556</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s refund claim for service tax credit on input services used for exporting output services was upheld by the Tribunal. The matter was remanded back to the first appellate authority for reconsideration of the correct refund amount calculation. The Tribunal found the appellant eligible for refund on air travel, accommodation services, and cargo handling services, based on evidence provided. The issue of cargo handling services was settled by previous judgments. The denial of input services due to address discrepancies on invoices was directed for further evidence submission. The Tribunal allowed the refund application within the specified time period, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 07:45:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 383 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361556</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s refund claim for service tax credit on input services used for exporting output services was upheld by the Tribunal. The matter was remanded back to the first appellate authority for reconsideration of the correct refund amount calculation. The Tribunal found the appellant eligible for refund on air travel, accommodation services, and cargo handling services, based on evidence provided. The issue of cargo handling services was settled by previous judgments. The denial of input services due to address discrepancies on invoices was directed for further evidence submission. The Tribunal allowed the refund application within the specified time period, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>