<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 382 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361555</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the refund claim for service tax paid on input services utilized pre-registration and on invoices drawn in the name of the marketing office. However, the denial of refund for specific services like rent-a-cab, personal insurance, and catering services, which were not contested by the appellant, was upheld. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by legal precedents and the case&#039;s particular facts, ensuring a fair outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 07:44:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 382 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361555</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the refund claim for service tax paid on input services utilized pre-registration and on invoices drawn in the name of the marketing office. However, the denial of refund for specific services like rent-a-cab, personal insurance, and catering services, which were not contested by the appellant, was upheld. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by legal precedents and the case&#039;s particular facts, ensuring a fair outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>