https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361553 The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal rejecting refund claims of unutilized cenvat credit for services exported between September 2009 to March 2012. It found the impugned order null and void in light of previous appeal disposals. Cenvat credit for input services from January 2012 to March 2012 was mostly allowed, except for Event Management Services. The appellant was granted the chance to submit FIRCs worth Rs. 49 lakhs for verification. The Tribunal directed a recalculation of the refund claim, favoring the appellant's method over the authorities', leading to the setting aside of certain orders and partial allowance of one appeal with consequential relief. en-us Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jun 2018 07:42:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361553 The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal rejecting refund claims of unutilized cenvat credit for services exported between September 2009 to March 2012. It found the impugned order null and void in light of previous appeal disposals. Cenvat credit for input services from January 2012 to March 2012 was mostly allowed, except for Event Management Services. The appellant was granted the chance to submit FIRCs worth Rs. 49 lakhs for verification. The Tribunal directed a recalculation of the refund claim, favoring the appellant's method over the authorities', leading to the setting aside of certain orders and partial allowance of one appeal with consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361553