<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 142 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13286</link>
    <description>The HC held that the Tribunal erred in its interpretation of section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the disallowance of excise duty collected but not paid. The court concluded that section 43B benefits apply only if the excise duty is actually paid. Consequently, the Tribunal&#039;s decision was set aside, and the reference was resolved in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 142 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13286</link>
      <description>The HC held that the Tribunal erred in its interpretation of section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the disallowance of excise duty collected but not paid. The court concluded that section 43B benefits apply only if the excise duty is actually paid. Consequently, the Tribunal&#039;s decision was set aside, and the reference was resolved in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>