<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 169 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13282</link>
    <description>The court quashed and set aside the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for reopening the assessment. The court found no valid reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment, emphasizing that the reasons for reopening were based on facts already on record and that the assessee had fully disclosed all material facts. As a result, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the notice and disposing of the writ petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 169 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13282</link>
      <description>The court quashed and set aside the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for reopening the assessment. The court found no valid reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment, emphasizing that the reasons for reopening were based on facts already on record and that the assessee had fully disclosed all material facts. As a result, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the notice and disposing of the writ petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>