<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (3) TMI 116 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273141</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the department regarding the addition of Rs. 25,000, invoking section 34(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. However, the court found in favor of the assessee regarding the enhancement of income from the Cochin business, deeming it unwarranted. The court did not address the issue of whether the notice was served and reassessment made in time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 10:13:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (3) TMI 116 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273141</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the department regarding the addition of Rs. 25,000, invoking section 34(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. However, the court found in favor of the assessee regarding the enhancement of income from the Cochin business, deeming it unwarranted. The court did not address the issue of whether the notice was served and reassessment made in time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>