<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1329 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273137</link>
    <description>The adjudicating authority admitted the application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) as the corporate debtor failed to pay operational dues of Rs. 2,19,92,896 despite receiving a demand notice. The authority found no valid dispute raised within the statutory period and the objections unsupported by evidence. The operational creditor met the requirements of Sections 9(3)(b) and 9(3)(c) of the Code, and the claim qualified as operational debt. Consequently, a moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code was imposed, appointing an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) and ordering necessary public announcements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 10:05:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1329 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273137</link>
      <description>The adjudicating authority admitted the application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) as the corporate debtor failed to pay operational dues of Rs. 2,19,92,896 despite receiving a demand notice. The authority found no valid dispute raised within the statutory period and the objections unsupported by evidence. The operational creditor met the requirements of Sections 9(3)(b) and 9(3)(c) of the Code, and the claim qualified as operational debt. Consequently, a moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code was imposed, appointing an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) and ordering necessary public announcements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>