<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 86 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13276</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of debenture issue expenditure, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The court emphasized the binding nature of circulars issued by the Board of Direct Taxes and ruled that the circular permitting the deduction prevailed over section 35D, as it left no room for debate. Consequently, the court found no substantial legal question, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:09:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 86 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13276</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of debenture issue expenditure, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The court emphasized the binding nature of circulars issued by the Board of Direct Taxes and ruled that the circular permitting the deduction prevailed over section 35D, as it left no room for debate. Consequently, the court found no substantial legal question, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>